NOW:53110:USA00949
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA00949
56°
H 57° L 56°
Clear | 6MPH

The Way I See It!

I am an Ultra-Conservative, Alpha-Male, True Authentic Leader, Type "C" Personality, who is very active in my community; whether it is donating time, clothes or money for Project Concern or going to Common Council meetings and voicing my opinions. As a blogger, I intend to provide a different viewpoint "The way I see it!" on various world, national and local issues with a few helpful tips & tidbits sprinkled in.

In the Email Inbox

Cudahy, DPW, Email, Mary Jo Lange, Tony Day, Mark Otto

So here are some emails that I received.

 

DPW Subject Emails:

 

-----------------------------------------

 

“Randy,

 

I am not sure if you saw that the Personnel Committee approved MJL’s [Mary Jo Lange]   Administration Clerk.  The DPW reorganization is already approved and moving forward and still no word on how much pay is she [Mary Jo Lange] going to lose since she will be doing less work and the DPW is going back to the way it was prior to her arrival!  My guess is NONE!!!!!!”

 

---------------------------------------------

 

Another two readers email me this:

 

------------

 

“Here's Mary Jo's personal secretary.  The Administration Clerk posting.

 

http://www.cudahy-wi.gov/cudahy/opportunities/job+opportunities/default.asp

 

-----------------------------------------------

 

“Randy, the position of MJ’s personal secretary is proceeding at warp speed. 

 

http://www.cudahy-wi.gov/cudahy/opportunities/job+opportunities/default.asp

 

Let’s watch who slots in there.  Any bets?  I will take Carolyn and then we will all know the answer as to if Mark Otto’s committee is going to approve it and the CC’s [Common Council] blessing.  When she takes the job, then things will get interesting.”

 

--------------------------------------------------------

 

“Doesn't anyone wonder why Whitnall Ave. was repaved TWICE?????”

 

--------------------------------------------------------

 

“Randy,

 

In relation to the DPW reorganization and Al, I am sure you would not find a specific motion if you went back and looked at the records.  All you would find is a motion to approve what was discussed in closed session (or something like that).  Joe Henika as Clerk / Treasurer would have never allowed something like this, however, they seem to get away with anything.  I am not sure why the push has been on to get rid of Al, however they (the Council) has been making his life miserable for almost two years.  Maybe he was just considered too much of the old guard ( different than Glowacki and the boys..), however if you look at McCue's three years and Day's two, they have gotten rid of ( or have retired) the Police Chief, Fire Chief, Assessor, DPW General Manager, Director of Engineering, Economic Development Coordinator, Chief Inspector and Public Health Officer.  Once they get rid of Al, they can claim they put the management team in place to run Cudahy for the next 10 to 20 years.”

 

----------------------------------------------------------

 

City of Cudahy Reorganization changes / Part Time Mayor Full Time Administrator

 

“Randy on Ald. Otto:

 

“If it is possible”, he knows better, or should.  As the chairman, he does not know the difference between advisory and binding?”

 

----------------------------------------------------------

 

Randy:

 

“While I was not at the meeting, Glowacki was a Day plant, I bet you on that.  Glowacki is a good friend of Day.  Glowacki also told someone that after his term expires on the Police and Fire Commission, he was done with city involvement.  That begs the question, why would he get involved now?  I tell you why, never trust him as far as you can throw him. 

 

Again, he was planted by Day.

 

Their meeting notice did have on it that a quorum of the council could be present. No surprise there.

 

As far as the referendum, my guess is they will go non binding or public hearing, and pass it anyway.  They want the ultimate power in the end, and Day is giving it to them.  They don't want public input, just the power.  I told you that a while ago.

 

Also, trust me, they are communicating to you to quiet you.  They want you on their side, or if not on their side, just quiet.  They are going to play nice to get what they want.”

 

--------------------------------------------------------------

 

“Randy,

I hear that tony wants to make Bruce unelected comptroller if his plan goes through.”

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

“Randy I blame the city for all of the mess and all the City Officials.  Had they been open and honest from the get go and posted and sent out information as you stated they should, rumors, half-truths and such would not be swirling around the city.  They didn’t and the blame falls on them!!!

 

They didn’t because they wanted to sneak this through and YOU busted it wide open!!!  We have no reporters in Cudahy and they know that.  We have just you to get the word out and that is why Otto is desperately attempting to discredit you.  He knows you are telling the truth and getting the facts out there and HE and Tony don’t want that to happen.  That is why when you asked Otto to point out what was “Grossly Inaccurate” he couldn’t!!!  I love that he sidestepped using your name as if people wouldn’t know who he was talking about.  What does he too take the people of Cudahy as idiots?”

 

------------------------------------------------------------

 

“I know you are hearing they are slowing down the process, you need to ask yourself why?  Also why now is there talk about Public Hearings???  The Aldermen are getting heat from this and they are not making things better since they will not come out publicly and let people know what is going on.  And Mayor Tony Day could have waited as you said and posted something in the Spring Cudahy newsletter but it was full speed ahead before the 2013 election.”

 

------------------------------------------------------------

 

“Randy,

Then new word on the street is it will stall until just before the 2013 election and then be voted on by the council as for some they may not be reelected and the others will just say it was truly for the better and an item will be placed allowing for whoever wins the Mayoral re-election to choose to be part time or not!”

This site uses Facebook comments to make it easier for you to contribute. If you see a comment you would like to flag for spam or abuse, click the "x" in the upper right of it. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Page Tools