I am an Ultra-Conservative, Alpha-Male, True Authentic Leader, Type "C" Personality, who is very active in my community; whether it is donating time, clothes or money for Project Concern or going to Common Council meetings and voicing my opinions. As a blogger, I intend to provide a different viewpoint "The way I see it!" on various world, national and local issues with a few helpful tips & tidbits sprinkled in.
Let’s say someone said something like this, “I do believe there needs to be a stopgap to keep Walker from stomping all over.”
Should the Wisconsin Supreme Court rule against Walker to act as a stopgap?
Would that not be legislating from the bench?
Who decides what or how much the Wisconsin Supreme Court should rule against Walker?
Does that person have an agenda or are they just looking for the truth?