NOW:53110:USA00949
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA00949
52°
H 52° L 52°
Cloudy | 6MPH

The Way I See It!

I am an Ultra-Conservative, Alpha-Male, True Authentic Leader, Type "C" Personality, who is very active in my community; whether it is donating time, clothes or money for Project Concern or going to Common Council meetings and voicing my opinions. As a blogger, I intend to provide a different viewpoint "The way I see it!" on various world, national and local issues with a few helpful tips & tidbits sprinkled in.

Public Sector Workers Union Dues = Democratic Campaign Contributions

Democrats, Wisconsin, Scott Walker, Public Sector Unions, PUP

A snippet from the Washington Examiner

 

 

Public unions force taxpayers to fund Democrats

By: Michael Barone 02/22/11 8:05 PM

Senior Political Analyst

 

Everyone has priorities.  During the past week Barack Obama has found no time to condemn the attacks that Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi has launched on the Libyan people.

 

But he did find time to be interviewed by a Wisconsin television station and weigh in on the dispute between Republican Gov. Scott Walker and the state's public employee unions.  Walker was staging "an assault on unions," he said, and added that "public employee unions make enormous contributions to our states and our citizens."

 

Enormous contributions, yes -- to the Democratic Party and the Obama campaign.  Unions, most of whose members are public employees, gave Democrats some $400 million in the 2008 election cycle.  The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the biggest public employee union, gave Democrats $90 million in the 2010 cycle.

 

Follow the money, Washington reporters like to say.  The money in this case comes from taxpayers, present and future, who are the source of every penny of dues paid to public employee unions, who in turn spend much of that money on politics, almost all of it for Democrats.  In effect, public employee unions are a mechanism by which every taxpayer is forced to fund the Democratic Party.

 

So, just as the president complained in his 2010 State of the Union address about a Supreme Court decision that he feared would increase the flow of money to Republicans, he also found time to complain about a proposed state law that could reduce the flow of money to Democrats.

 

It's true that Walker's proposals would strike hard at the power of the public employee unions.  They would no longer have the right to bargain for fringe benefits, which are threatening to bankrupt the state government, and they would no longer be able to count on government withholding dues money and passing it along to them.

 

But what are the contributions that public employee unions make to our states and our citizens?  Their incentives are to increase the cost of government and reduce down toward zero the accountability of public employees -- both contrary to the interests of taxpaying citizens.

 

What citizens of states with strong public employee unions do get are higher taxes and enormous pension burdens that threaten to squeeze out funds for ongoing services, as even Democratic governors like Andrew Cuomo of New York and Jerry Brown of California have figured out.

 

That's why one of the great 20th century presidents was against unions for public employees who have civil service protections.  No, not Ronald Reagan.  It was Franklin Roosevelt who said, "Action looking toward the paralysis of government by those who have sworn to support it is unthinkable and intolerable."

 

So while the Wisconsin unions are defying the law, Scott Walker is in effect following FDR's lead, and if he's successful others may follow.  That would be an enormous blow to the money power of the public employee union bosses.

 

Now hard economic times have left voters wondering why public employees pay practically zero toward their health insurance and pensions when they have to pay plenty themselves.  Wisconsin, which led the nation on civil service a century ago and on welfare reform in the 1990s, may be showing the nation the way ahead once again.

 

Source and Full Article: Washington Examiner

 

This site uses Facebook comments to make it easier for you to contribute. If you see a comment you would like to flag for spam or abuse, click the "x" in the upper right of it. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Page Tools